Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
19 bytes added ,  14:09, August 12, 2011
Created a link
Line 11: Line 11:  
Agnostics differ from regular [[Atheism|atheists]] in that they do not deny God's existence.
 
Agnostics differ from regular [[Atheism|atheists]] in that they do not deny God's existence.
   −
Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that God exists, they combine the unsure and "surely not" into one lump. For these believers, an "atheist" is anyone who doesn't believe in God.
+
Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that God exists, they combine the unsure and "surely not" into one lump. For these believers, an "atheist" is any [[faithless]] person who doesn't believe in God.
    
Among those who have not decided whether to believe in God, or to disbelieve in Him, there are two main groups:
 
Among those who have not decided whether to believe in God, or to disbelieve in Him, there are two main groups:
Line 19: Line 19:  
[[Bertrand Russell]] once wrote that, in describing his beliefs,
 
[[Bertrand Russell]] once wrote that, in describing his beliefs,
 
:I never know whether I should say 'Agnostic' or whether I should say 'Atheist'.... As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one [can] prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.<ref>Russell, Bertrand (1947) [http://www.luminary.us/russell/atheist_agnostic.html Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic?] Most online sources say "by which one prove," probably a mistake.</ref>
 
:I never know whether I should say 'Agnostic' or whether I should say 'Atheist'.... As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one [can] prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.<ref>Russell, Bertrand (1947) [http://www.luminary.us/russell/atheist_agnostic.html Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic?] Most online sources say "by which one prove," probably a mistake.</ref>
 +
 
== Norman Geisler on Complete Agnosticism ==
 
== Norman Geisler on Complete Agnosticism ==
  
8

edits

Navigation menu