4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 208:
Line 208: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 20:33, April 6, 2007
, 20:33, April 6, 2007→unwinable battle
==unwinable battle==
==unwinable battle==
Glad to see that section removed, as it was essentially a big "so what?" Crowing that "noted evangelical scholars" (a bit of an oxymoron) signed such and such petition supporting Bible inerrancy is as valueless as a petition signed by baseball player saying they support baseball. @@ [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 08:22, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Glad to see that section removed, as it was essentially a big "so what?" Crowing that "noted evangelical scholars" (a bit of an oxymoron) signed such and such petition supporting Bible inerrancy is as valueless as a petition signed by baseball player saying they support baseball. @@ [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 08:22, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
=="Contradictions need to be proved"==
Looks like a long paragraph of someone's personal opinion. Is there a source somewhere that defines what a "Biblical contradiction" is? A generally accepted rulebook that says whom the "onus" is upon and so forth? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:33, 6 April 2007 (EDT)