Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Mystery:Why is the Senate More Liberal than the House? (view source)

Revision as of 04:24, August 13, 2011

270 bytes added ,  04:24, August 13, 2011
→‎Influence of money?: Big-money donors like Hollywood types tend to be more liberal than churchgoers and homeschoolers, and hence Senate winners tend to more liberal than grassroots campaigner
Line 24: Line 24:  
:::Does anyone agree with me?--[[User:MorrisF|MorrisF]] 22:58, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Does anyone agree with me?--[[User:MorrisF|MorrisF]] 22:58, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Not really. I think you're indulging in some special pleading. There's only one reason that so many Republicans and Democrats in Congress were for the bailout. You can say they weren't "true conservatives," but on the same token "true liberals" can complain that John Kerry wasn't one of them. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 12:14, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Not really. I think you're indulging in some special pleading. There's only one reason that so many Republicans and Democrats in Congress were for the bailout. You can say they weren't "true conservatives," but on the same token "true liberals" can complain that John Kerry wasn't one of them. [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 12:14, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Big-money donors like Hollywood types tend to be more liberal than churchgoers and [[homeschoolers]], and hence Senate winners tend to more liberal than grassroots campaigners who can win in the House.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:24, 13 August 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/900245"

Navigation menu