| Line 60: |
Line 60: |
| | ===See also ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"''=== | | ===See also ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"''=== |
| | | | |
| − | ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' explains [[Einsteinian gravitation]] in terms of curvatures of space and time (while assuming the spacetime being ''flat'' since the sum of two curvatures may come out as intinsically ''flat'', or [[Minkowski]] spacetime) explaining on its way the phenomenon of [[cosmological redshift]] as caused by the curvature of space coupled with the time (the time runing slower at the deep space galaxies roughly proportionally to distance, in fact exponentially slower). | + | ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' created in 1985 and rejected by scientific journals until now, is Einsteinian type theory explaining gravitational force in terms of quantum effect of particles taking spontaneously (without being prompted to do so by any direct force) the most probable position of lowest energy in spacetime. It happens in the intrinsically flat, [[Minkowski]], spacetime (as also proposed in 1993 by Narlikar and Arp<ref>Narlikar, J. & Arp, H. Flat spacetime cosmology - a unifiedframework for extragalactic redshifts. 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 |
| | | | |
| − | The [[cosmological redshift]] was taken not long time ago for a sign that the universe is expanding. The project meant to prove that expansion of space is decelerating, to add credibility to the Big Bang hypohtesis (in agreement with John Archibald Wheeler's theory), showed that to the contrary, the universe seems to be expanding with accelerating expansion. <math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>, where <math>H</math> is Hubble "constant", <math>t</math> is our time, <math>H_o</math> is Hubble "constant" at <math>t=0</math>, which was just the acceleration predicted by Einsteinian gravitation as ''apparent'' accelerating expansion that should be observed if [[Einsteinian gravitation]] where a right theory. A billion dollar experiment that went wrong. Not for [[Einsteinian gravitation]] though.
| + | </ref>) that is necessary for strict conservation of energy, used to demonstrate that our iniverse is not expanding. The conservation of energy follows from Noether theorem, in absence of expansion of universe. The [[gravitation demystified]] is meant as a continuation of Einstein's general relativity based on his 1917 stationary model of universe with an important change of introducing non symmetric temporal part of Ricci tensor (named Hubble tensor) which also removed Einstein's cosmological constant, ''"the biggest blunder of my life"'' in Einstein's words, from his field equation. Coupling the curvature of space to the time dilation made the time runing at the deep space galaxies exponentially slower with distance, which produced the observed illusion of accelerating expansion. |
| | | | |
| − | However the Big Bang aficionados patched their theory with "[[dark energy]]" insisting that the universe is expanding because of this energy, faster and faster. Now they are looking for this energy in the universe while papers on [[Einsteinian gravitation]] aren't published in scientific journals.
| + | The [[cosmological redshift]] was taken not long time ago for a sign that the universe is expanding. The project meant to prove that expansion of space is decelerating, to add credibility to the Big Bang hypohtesis (in agreement with John Archibald Wheeler's theory), showed that to the contrary, the universe seems to be expanding with accelerating expansion. <math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>, where <math>H</math> is Hubble "constant", <math>t</math> is coordinate time, <math>H_o</math> is Hubble "constant" at <math>t=0</math>, which was just the acceleration predicted by Einsteinian gravitation as ''apparent'' accelerating expansion that should be observed if [[Einsteinian gravitation]] where the right theory. |
| | + | |
| | + | It was observed with accuracy better than one standard deviation (max possible) but the Big Bang aficionados patched their "theory" with "[[dark energy]]" insisting that the universe is expanding because of this dark energy, faster and faster. Now they are looking for this energy in the universe while papers on [[Einsteinian gravitation]] aren't still rejected by scientific journals. |
| | | | |
| | ==External Links== | | ==External Links== |