Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 287:
Line 287: + +
Talk:Essay:Politicians Who Had a Real Career (view source)
Revision as of 00:45, August 15, 2011
, 00:45, August 15, 2011→Michele Bachmann: I appreciate your wit! But the reality is that a principled conservative can get good laws passed by Democratic Congresses better than RINOs can, as Reagan illustrated. ...
:::::::Politics is about the future, not the past, and Bachmann is hardly a "complete unknown[]." Bachmann's views and voting record have been well-known for years.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:22, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::::Politics is about the future, not the past, and Bachmann is hardly a "complete unknown[]." Bachmann's views and voting record have been well-known for years.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:22, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::::I'll buy you a pint of the Schlafly family's finest if President Bachmann doesn't find it as difficult to negotiate with stroppy Democrats as Obama does with stroppy Republicans. [[User:KhalidM|KhalidM]] 18:08, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::::I'll buy you a pint of the Schlafly family's finest if President Bachmann doesn't find it as difficult to negotiate with stroppy Democrats as Obama does with stroppy Republicans. [[User:KhalidM|KhalidM]] 18:08, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::I appreciate your wit! But the reality is that a principled conservative can get good laws passed by Democratic Congresses better than [[RINO]]s can, as Reagan illustrated. Moreover, Bachmann's coattails could bring in a conservative Congress. We'll see. But regardless, Bachmann's influence is substantial already.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:45, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
== Obamacare? ==
== Obamacare? ==