Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 590: Line 590:     
:: Moving further down your list, your response on point 6 is particularly unpersuasive.  The increasingly precise data disprove the theory.  It's that simple.  If scientists have "moved on" in an attempt to avoid addressing this discrepancy, then that's politics rather than good science.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:10, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:: Moving further down your list, your response on point 6 is particularly unpersuasive.  The increasingly precise data disprove the theory.  It's that simple.  If scientists have "moved on" in an attempt to avoid addressing this discrepancy, then that's politics rather than good science.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:10, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::SamHB, I really appreciate your intervent. Andy, you're right, logic and science are not determined by consensus, but if someone's logic fails someone else should tell him, don't you think? Why are you so firm in keeping this page in this form when there are (lots of) people who ''knows'' what are they talking about? --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 08:29, 15 August 2011 (EDT)
79

edits

Navigation menu