Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,784
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Inappropriateness of Methodological Naturalism in Science in regards to Origins
:Note, however, that groups like E. Scott's NCSE '''assert''' that ID is creationist. She never loses an opportunity to refer to ID as "Intelligent Design Creationism". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:18, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:Note, however, that groups like E. Scott's NCSE '''assert''' that ID is creationist. She never loses an opportunity to refer to ID as "Intelligent Design Creationism". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:18, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:ID was developed to overcome to legal shortcomings of creation science, I sketched the bare bones of the issue just now. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 22:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
==Admission==
:Creation Science admitted Genesis as its primary source, but attempted to gain at least equal time for the teaching of evolution, a humble goal considering that in the 1925 Scopes "Monkey" trial the defendent was in fact found guilty of breaking the Butler law in Tennessee prohibiting the teaching of evolution.
I'm not sure about this: admitted, attempted, humble goal? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:02, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
== Inappropriateness of Methodological Naturalism in Science in regards to Origins ==
I think this material should be incorporated within the article:
Inappropriateness of Methodological Naturalism in Science in regards to Origins
http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od181/methnat181.htm
http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od182/methnat182.htm
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/plantinga_alvin.htm (features two links to Alvin Plantinga's material on the subject)
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/topics/Philosophy/PSCF9-97Plantinga.html (Plantinga essay)
http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:26, 15 April 2007 (EDT)conservative