Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 611:
Line 611: − +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, August 16, 2011
, 18:34, August 16, 2011grammar
::::::Relativity is a mathematically complete system that is either true or false ''in toto''. Pretending that Relativity can be true despite a counterexample against it is like saying that a number can be partially prime.
::::::Relativity is a mathematically complete system that is either true or false ''in toto''. Pretending that Relativity can be true despite a counterexample against it is like saying that a number can be partially prime.
::::::The problem, of course, is that no one who wants tenure, a Nobel Prize, or even self-esteem within the liberal university system dare admit that Relativity might not be true. That alone is telling: if Relativity were true, then there would not be the need for it to be propped up by political pressure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:27, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::The problem, of course, is that no one who wants tenure, a Nobel Prize, or even self-esteem within the liberal university system dares admit that Relativity might not be true. That alone is telling: if Relativity were true, then there would not be the need for it to be propped up by political pressure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:27, 16 August 2011 (EDT)