SkipCaptcha
441
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: +
no edit summary
:::::Overprice isn't an opinion for sports cars. If a $30k car can beat a $120k car on the track it is obviously way overpriced. [[User:Craig F|Craig F]] 18:39 August 16th 2011
:::::Overprice isn't an opinion for sports cars. If a $30k car can beat a $120k car on the track it is obviously way overpriced. [[User:Craig F|Craig F]] 18:39 August 16th 2011
::::::That doesn't make it overpriced though. The word overpriced is covered in opinion and it's best to just avoid it completely. There is much more neutral ways to bring light to the fact Cheaper American Cars beat it.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:43, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::That doesn't make it overpriced though. The word overpriced is covered in opinion and it's best to just avoid it completely. There is much more neutral ways to bring light to the fact Cheaper American Cars beat it.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:43, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::::I looked it up in the dictionary [http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/overpriced] and found out that overpriced means worth less than the price charged. A track car's worth is it's speed so if a track car is more expensive and slower, it is obviously overpriced. I don't understand how something as objective as the fact that Ferraris are over priced is considered non neutral, lots of Ferrari fan boys might try to say that this is non neutral, but they don't want to face the facts. [[User:Craig F|Craig F]] 18:45 August 16th 2011