SkipCaptcha
966
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + +
→I think we have a misunderstanding: new section
When making a major edit like the one you did on the Henry Ford article, it's best to present your case on the talk page before editing/deleting/reverting. References from reliable sources that help support your arguments also are a very good idea. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:26, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
When making a major edit like the one you did on the Henry Ford article, it's best to present your case on the talk page before editing/deleting/reverting. References from reliable sources that help support your arguments also are a very good idea. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:26, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
== I think we have a misunderstanding ==
I don't doubt that he worked with nazis, that he did horrible things or that any of them can be justified. However, i don't accept the reasoning that working with somebody makes you one of them. Now if he actually joined the Nazi party, then i will say he was a nazi. IF he didn't, At best, you can call him a nazi affiliate.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 00:55, 17 August 2011 (EDT)