SkipCaptcha
1,125
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 02:08, August 18, 2011
, 02:08, August 18, 2011→Artistic beauty argument: These people?
::::::::Brad, the existence of artistic beauty in nature is incompatible with the theory of functional evolution. If you know of any evolutionists who accept the existence of artistic beauty in nature, then please do post some examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:00, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::::Brad, the existence of artistic beauty in nature is incompatible with the theory of functional evolution. If you know of any evolutionists who accept the existence of artistic beauty in nature, then please do post some examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:00, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::::: Atheists like Stephen Hawking, David Attenborough and, more recently, Brian Cox go to great pains to extol the beauty and rhythm of the universe and nature. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 22:08, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
== float like a butterfly and sting like a creationist bee ==
== float like a butterfly and sting like a creationist bee ==