Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: +
cat
Brian Lowry of ''Variety'' wrote:
Brian Lowry of ''Variety'' wrote:
* As a scientist, Hawking concludes, it's completely valid to question "whether we need a God to explain the universe at all," proceeding to methodically lay out the case for the Big Bang Theory (and what could create something out of nothingness) and natural laws that don't require a spiritual component. [http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945762]
* As a scientist, Hawking concludes, it's completely valid to question "whether we need a God to explain the universe at all," proceeding to methodically lay out the case for the Big Bang Theory (and what could create something out of nothingness) and natural laws that don't require a spiritual component. [http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945762]
[[Category:Television Programs]]