Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:     
''See also:'' [http://creation.com/history-questions-and-answers How reliable is biblical chronology?]
 
''See also:'' [http://creation.com/history-questions-and-answers How reliable is biblical chronology?]
 +
 +
== Old appearance ==
 +
 +
Despite many examples of the Earth appearing to look old (light from far off galaxies, natural erosion, fossils that appear much older than they are and others), the counterexamples completely disprove the assertion that it is more than 6,000 years old. There are no true counterexamples to these counterexamples since they are already disproved by the counterexamples. We are left with no other logical conclusion.
    
== Recommended books ==
 
== Recommended books ==
28

edits

Navigation menu