Changes

Per Andy, information/instructions have been added to the site area, Conservapedia:Administrators [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Administrators]]  Ed and I, among some others, will be working with Andy to develop some guidelines for handling dispute resolution among Sysop's, etc.  Input from all current Sysop's is encouraged, once we decide the exact parameters.  In the interests of transparency, I would like to suggest Bureaucrats and Sysop's add their designation to their sig lines.  Not for self-aggrandizement as one user has suggested, but as a means to let users know who is giving suggestions or instruction.  Users deserve to know, IMO, exactly who is speaking, and what their interests are, and who can block them, and who cannot.  It is only fair, and we can't expect everyone to go looking up all participants. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 19:12, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Per Andy, information/instructions have been added to the site area, Conservapedia:Administrators [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Administrators]]  Ed and I, among some others, will be working with Andy to develop some guidelines for handling dispute resolution among Sysop's, etc.  Input from all current Sysop's is encouraged, once we decide the exact parameters. We don't want to become top heavy with minute rules!  

 

In the interests of transparency, I would like to suggest Bureaucrats and Sysop's add their designation to their sig lines.  Not for self-aggrandizement as one user has suggested, but as a means to let users know who is giving suggestions or instruction.  Users deserve to know, IMO, exactly who is speaking to them, and what their interests are, who can block them, and who cannot.  It is only fair, and we can't expect everyone to go looking up all participants. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] ^{[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]} 19:12, 6 April 2007 (EDT)