Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + + +
to Brad
::::I apologize for jumping to conclusions. I plan to work on the article, just need to gather sources for info and whatnot. I haven't really used Ie since 6 (I use firefox) so i dont have as much experience with the problems of 7-9--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
::::I apologize for jumping to conclusions. I plan to work on the article, just need to gather sources for info and whatnot. I haven't really used Ie since 6 (I use firefox) so i dont have as much experience with the problems of 7-9--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Studies have shown that IE9 is by far and away the most secure browser on the market. Should we include both sides of this story? [[User:BradB|BradB]] 19:57, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Studies have shown that IE9 is by far and away the most secure browser on the market. Should we include both sides of this story? [[User:BradB|BradB]] 19:57, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::We should include both sides of the story, but not just the side you and Sean are pushing. The phrase "studies have shown" is not trustworthy; it's the usual lead-in to liberal trickery. You may as well say studies have shown that legal gun ownership "kills kids" (when what you have in mind is a study of the illegal drug sales which defines includes adults up to 25 years old).
:::::Unless you can provide some genuine insight into [[browser security]], you better not get involved in this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:37, 19 August 2011 (EDT)