Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: − ::If they do not sound correct to you, then you may change them to what is not Propaganda, if microsoft says they are adding more security in the source i used, then that is what I am going to put into the article. If you find another source that says otherwise, please, put it here or edit the article itself with said information. And even then, saying it increased security does not mean that it is a nigh-impregnable bastion which no virus can push through, it just means that it has more security, how much said more is is not stated. + − − ::and why the accusation I was deliberately trying to insert false information? It was midnight and I picked the first available Google result, which the external links here considers truthful enough to also include for those seeking more information. It isn't like I planned to just leave the stuff there with a single source from Microsoft, I simply haven't gotten around to getting more info for the article. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 17:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT) − − :::Calm down, no one accused you. ''Hard to believe'' != ''You are guilty''. Please lecture me less on what I can or shouldn't do, and spend more time fixing the article. Specifically, I need you to address the issue of browser security. Otherwise, the whole article should be deleted, because as it stands now it is misleading. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:28, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Irrelevant contributor-admin exchange deleted
:Come to think of it, it's hard to believe this was an innocent error. I need you to submit a [[Conservapedia:Writing plan]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:55, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
:Come to think of it, it's hard to believe this was an innocent error. I need you to submit a [[Conservapedia:Writing plan]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:55, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
[Irrelevant contributor-admin exchange deleted]
::::I apologize for jumping to conclusions. I plan to work on the article, just need to gather sources for info and whatnot. I haven't really used Ie since 6 (I use firefox) so i dont have as much experience with the problems of 7-9--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
::::I apologize for jumping to conclusions. I plan to work on the article, just need to gather sources for info and whatnot. I haven't really used Ie since 6 (I use firefox) so i dont have as much experience with the problems of 7-9--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:30, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Studies have shown that IE9 is by far and away the most secure browser on the market. Should we include both sides of this story? [[User:BradB|BradB]] 19:57, 18 August 2011 (EDT)
Studies have shown that IE9 is by far and away the most secure browser on the market. Should we include both sides of this story? [[User:BradB|BradB]] 19:57, 18 August 2011 (EDT)