Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Questions?: as I understand it
Line 6: Line 6:     
*Look-see, Conservapedia Commandments and Guidelines, Rob.  ''Bottom line is, just like every other site on the Net, there are those entrusted to implement and speak to policy issues, and those who are not.'' There are those appointed to resolve disputes, settle matters among members, and take disciplinary action.  Per the continued complaints of some, about just what Sysop's and Bureaucrats are, and what their duties are, and what authority they have, Andy decided to make it more transparent for all, by adding the additional language to what was already there.  Our "philosophy" is loosely grounded on Conservative and Christain principles, and specifically on, but not exclusively, the Commandments.  The "Guidelines" also govern the site as well. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 19:51, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 
*Look-see, Conservapedia Commandments and Guidelines, Rob.  ''Bottom line is, just like every other site on the Net, there are those entrusted to implement and speak to policy issues, and those who are not.'' There are those appointed to resolve disputes, settle matters among members, and take disciplinary action.  Per the continued complaints of some, about just what Sysop's and Bureaucrats are, and what their duties are, and what authority they have, Andy decided to make it more transparent for all, by adding the additional language to what was already there.  Our "philosophy" is loosely grounded on Conservative and Christain principles, and specifically on, but not exclusively, the Commandments.  The "Guidelines" also govern the site as well. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 19:51, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: The question, as I understand it, is "we do not block for ideological reasons" and "we do block for ... points contrary to the Conservapedia philosophy."  Are these two things clear and distinct?  Will a person get blocked for adding material that paints a more favorable image of something that is currently one sided? Is that ideological? or philosophical? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:53, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
1,129

edits

Navigation menu