Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Piltdown Man (view source)

Revision as of 12:46, August 22, 2011

311 bytes added ,  12:46, August 22, 2011
It illustrates the lack of scientific method by evolutionists. Why did it take evolutionists nearly 40 years to discredit the Piltdown Man, after teaching in textbooks for decades?
Line 5: Line 5:  
:[[Clarence Darrow]] did not oppose it.  The [[Piltdown Man]] was taught in the textbook at issue in the [[Scopes Trial]].  How often do you hear that admitted by an evolutionist today?  Most evolutionists did not admit that the [[Piltdown Man]] was a hoax '''''for nearly forty years'''''.  Real science is not that slow to identify falsehoods.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:59, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:[[Clarence Darrow]] did not oppose it.  The [[Piltdown Man]] was taught in the textbook at issue in the [[Scopes Trial]].  How often do you hear that admitted by an evolutionist today?  Most evolutionists did not admit that the [[Piltdown Man]] was a hoax '''''for nearly forty years'''''.  Real science is not that slow to identify falsehoods.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:59, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::Darrow wasn't a scientist and doesn't seem to have been very educated in general. Most evolutionists started to ignore the Piltdown bones when their finder restricted access to them for the obvious reasons and other finds fitted into their theory better. I just think it was a big deal 90 years ago but is pretty irrelevant now. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::Darrow wasn't a scientist and doesn't seem to have been very educated in general. Most evolutionists started to ignore the Piltdown bones when their finder restricted access to them for the obvious reasons and other finds fitted into their theory better. I just think it was a big deal 90 years ago but is pretty irrelevant now. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::It illustrates the lack of scientific method by evolutionists.  Why did it take evolutionists nearly 40 years to discredit the [[Piltdown Man]], after teaching in textbooks for decades?  The answer is obvious:  because evolution is not science.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 08:46, 22 August 2011 (EDT)
    
== The article presently needs to back up its claims with citations/links ==
 
== The article presently needs to back up its claims with citations/links ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,911

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/904297"

Navigation menu