SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 189:
Line 189: + + +
Debate:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution? (view source)
Revision as of 05:16, August 23, 2011
, 05:16, August 23, 2011→A Better Question Would Be...
I Believe in the direction BenP is going...but I personally don't think it should even be allowed on public property; private is most certainly allowed. Reason being this: while BenP understands that "some taxpayers are being required to pay for speech they don't support" you also have to remember that the public property has to be maintained with taxpayers money as well. And it is public property, not christian property. I certainly wouldn't want my walk in the park infested with billboards of multitudes of faiths vying for my attention.
I Believe in the direction BenP is going...but I personally don't think it should even be allowed on public property; private is most certainly allowed. Reason being this: while BenP understands that "some taxpayers are being required to pay for speech they don't support" you also have to remember that the public property has to be maintained with taxpayers money as well. And it is public property, not christian property. I certainly wouldn't want my walk in the park infested with billboards of multitudes of faiths vying for my attention.
Can someone clarify for me, public property and government property are exactly the same, right? If not, what's the difference? - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 01:16, 23 August 2011 (EDT)