| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | | | |
| | The campaign features tracts, t-shirts, badges, mugs, etc. and students are being encouraged to participate in the campaign.<ref>http://creation.com/question-evolution</ref> | | The campaign features tracts, t-shirts, badges, mugs, etc. and students are being encouraged to participate in the campaign.<ref>http://creation.com/question-evolution</ref> |
| | + | === The 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer === |
| | + | |
| | + | The [http://aufiles.creation.com/images/pdfs/flyers/15-questions-for-evolutionists-a4.pdf 15 questions of the Question evolution! campaign], summarized, are: |
| | + | |
| | + | # How did [[Origin of Life|life originate]]? How did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without [[intelligent design]]? |
| | + | # How did the [[DNA]] code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? |
| | + | # How could such errors (mutations) create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? How can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines? |
| | + | # Why is [[natural selection]] taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? |
| | + | # How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? |
| | + | # Living things [[intelligent design|look like they were designed]], so how do evolutionists know that they were ''not'' designed? Why should science be restricted to [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic causes]] rather than [[logic|logical]] causes? |
| | + | # How did multi-cellular life originate? |
| | + | # How did [[sex]] originate? |
| | + | # Why are the (expected) countless millions of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Lack_of_Any_Clear_Transitional_Forms transitional fossils missing]? |
| | + | # How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years? |
| | + | # How did blind chemistry create mind/intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? |
| | + | # Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? |
| | + | # Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind? |
| | + | # Why is evolution, a theory about ''history'', taught as if it is the same as this ''operational'' science? |
| | + | # Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in ''science'' classes? If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught? |
| | + | |
| | + | The Question evolution! campaign tract with the expanded questions includes short arguments and/or quotes in support of biblical [[creation]], in additionally offers links to articles on CMI's website providing supporting evidence.<ref>[http://aufiles.creation.com/images/pdfs/flyers/15-questions-for-evolutionists-a4.pdf 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==== Question evolution! campaign and Texas ==== | | ==== Question evolution! campaign and Texas ==== |