| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO, WE ARE COMPLETELY ANONYMOUS. ANON IS COMING. COMING FOR YOU. WE CAN ACCESS YOUR WEBSITE FROM ANYWHERE. ANYTIME. NOTHING YOU DO CAN STOP US. YOUR PARODY IS NO MATCH FOR US.
| + | {{essay}} |
| | + | We want to provide a trustworthy [[encyclopedia]]. It's a good idea |
| | + | to let the reader know where we got the information, so they can |
| | + | decide how reliable that source is. [[NASA]] is a good source for |
| | + | astronomy and space travel. The [[United Nations]] may or may not be a |
| | + | reliable source of economic, political or scientific data. |
| | + | |
| | + | Also, as a matter of [[scholarly ethics]], the [[academic community]] |
| | + | considers it important to be open about how much of any work you wrote |
| | + | yourself, and how much you copied from others; see [[plagiarism]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | Whatever federal information the U.S. government creates and releases into the [[public domain]] is really our stuff (as taxpayers). There is no law requiring credit to be given for copying public domain writing; by definition it is "ownerless" (public) property. |
| | + | |
| | + | However, it is usually a good service to our readers, if we cite the |
| | + | agency and/or author of public domain works. If only because it makes |
| | + | the article more trustworthy. But also because it gives the reader a |
| | + | hint of where to go for more information. |