SkipCaptcha
708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Essay:Problems in Cosmology (view source)
Revision as of 12:26, August 25, 2011
, 12:26, August 25, 2011Created page with "Problem number one in cosmology seems to be whether the universe is expanding or it only looks like it. The expansion might be very well an illusion caused by the relativity of t..."
Problem number one in cosmology seems to be whether the universe is expanding or it only looks like it. The expansion might be very well an illusion caused by the relativity of time that might be running at the deep space galaxies slower than in our Galaxy. Which even Newtonian gravitation requires as it is shown in my [[Einsteinian gravitation]] that is slightly different than what the contemporary astronomers and cosmologists think. The most prominent difference is flat (or [[Minkowski]]) spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]] <ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref> instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the Big Bang hypothesis.
The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).
According to my calculations, not refuted yet by any cosmologist (while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked my calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which I sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review. Note from the ''[["Nature"]]'' editor is on my university's physics server together with all other alleged errors in my texts that I gethered in one file for easy access to them. Unfortunately my access to the server is presently blocked by the university for unknown reason, hopefully temporarily.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einstein's model universe of 1917, its Hubble constant (ratio of assumed recession velocity of galaxies to their distance) <math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>, where <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>R_E</math> is [[Einstein's radius]] of [[curvature of space]] implies <math>R_E=13</math> billion light years, and density of space of space of universe <math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math> and illusion of accelerating expansion with <math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math> that was observed in 1998 with accuracy to one standard deviation and therefore confirmed observationally.
The almost Newtonian calculations suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as <math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>, where <math>d \tau/dt</math> is rate of time at distant galaxy <math>\tau</math> in relation to our time <math>t</math>, <math>r</math> is distance to this galaxy and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].
==References==
<references/>
[[Category: Cosmology]]
The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).
According to my calculations, not refuted yet by any cosmologist (while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked my calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which I sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review. Note from the ''[["Nature"]]'' editor is on my university's physics server together with all other alleged errors in my texts that I gethered in one file for easy access to them. Unfortunately my access to the server is presently blocked by the university for unknown reason, hopefully temporarily.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einstein's model universe of 1917, its Hubble constant (ratio of assumed recession velocity of galaxies to their distance) <math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>, where <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>R_E</math> is [[Einstein's radius]] of [[curvature of space]] implies <math>R_E=13</math> billion light years, and density of space of space of universe <math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math> and illusion of accelerating expansion with <math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math> that was observed in 1998 with accuracy to one standard deviation and therefore confirmed observationally.
The almost Newtonian calculations suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as <math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>, where <math>d \tau/dt</math> is rate of time at distant galaxy <math>\tau</math> in relation to our time <math>t</math>, <math>r</math> is distance to this galaxy and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].
==References==
<references/>
[[Category: Cosmology]]