Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
267 bytes added ,  18:45, August 25, 2011
Line 14: Line 14:  
I note with some concern the things that you have been writing, about yourself, and about relativity and such.  They lead me to suspect that you are a "crackpot".  Your statements that things your have written have been rejected by the scientific establishment only reinforce this.  Now I'm not going to recommand that your writings be deleted or reverted, though I will raise some questions below.  People should have a forum from which they can argue for what they believe, and Conservapedia may be just the place for you.  It certainly hosts other seriously unorthodox ideas.  I like to think that the scientific and mathematical articles at Conservapedia do not go off into seriously and demonstrably wrong things, but it's not for me to say.  This may be just the right forum for you.
 
I note with some concern the things that you have been writing, about yourself, and about relativity and such.  They lead me to suspect that you are a "crackpot".  Your statements that things your have written have been rejected by the scientific establishment only reinforce this.  Now I'm not going to recommand that your writings be deleted or reverted, though I will raise some questions below.  People should have a forum from which they can argue for what they believe, and Conservapedia may be just the place for you.  It certainly hosts other seriously unorthodox ideas.  I like to think that the scientific and mathematical articles at Conservapedia do not go off into seriously and demonstrably wrong things, but it's not for me to say.  This may be just the right forum for you.
   −
 
+
:I have similar suspicions. Most items on the crackpottery checklist (grandiose claims of new discoveries, complaints of censorship by the establishment, use of non-standard definitions etc) are ticked off. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 14:45, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
    
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.
 
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.
539

edits

Navigation menu