Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 969: Line 969:  
: It's implausible that spiral galaxies would be much younger than the universe itself.  The fact that spiral galaxies are young implies that the universe is young.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
 
: It's implausible that spiral galaxies would be much younger than the universe itself.  The fact that spiral galaxies are young implies that the universe is young.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
   −
== The variability of the speed of light as a ==
+
== The variability of the speed of light as a counterexample to relativity requires a 2-billion-year-old universe ==
    
Aschlafly, on the counterexamples to relativity page you made the argument that the speed of light was not constant based on [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html this study], which argues that the speed of light might have been different 2 billion years ago. How does this reconcile with an young universe? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Aschlafly, on the counterexamples to relativity page you made the argument that the speed of light was not constant based on [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html this study], which argues that the speed of light might have been different 2 billion years ago. How does this reconcile with an young universe? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
233

edits

Navigation menu