Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Freshwater and Saltwater Fish: please improve this counterexample
Line 999: Line 999:     
:::Good point, Mr. Schlafly, but this counterexample is still based on evolution of fish (or lack thereof). Can it be restated so that it does not assume evolution is true? --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 22:16, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Good point, Mr. Schlafly, but this counterexample is still based on evolution of fish (or lack thereof). Can it be restated so that it does not assume evolution is true? --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 22:16, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Please improve how this counterexample is stated!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:18, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,898

edits

Navigation menu