Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 149:
Line 149: +
→Obvious intentions of bias in the article
Listing fraudulent evidence offers only to attempt to discredit a theory. There's as much to talk about for Creationism, and it doesn't have any real effect on educating people about the theory or its evidence or lack-there-of, as this article doesn't address any evidence of evolution. [[User:Valuables|Valuables]] 17:42, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
Listing fraudulent evidence offers only to attempt to discredit a theory. There's as much to talk about for Creationism, and it doesn't have any real effect on educating people about the theory or its evidence or lack-there-of, as this article doesn't address any evidence of evolution. [[User:Valuables|Valuables]] 17:42, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
:::I see you still have no supported your claim that science is an open forum. By the way, how much history of science material have you read? For example, are you familiar with historical figure Ignaz Semmelweis?[http://creation.com/but-if-creation-is-true-why-dont-all-scientists-believe-it][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:00, 27 August 2011 (EDT)
== changes to the evolution article ==
== changes to the evolution article ==
Although the Conservapedia evolution article is a thorn in the side of many internet atheists/evolutionists (as it cites evolutionists candidly admitting the many fatal and serious weaknesses of the evolutionary paradigm) and continues to be a well trafficked article at Conservapedia, Conservapedia is considering making some changes to the CP evolution article. Of course, evolutionism devotees and other cranks will play no part in the revisions. There is no pressing need to do this, however, given that the [[Question evolution! campaign]] will grind away at evolutionary nonsense with great alacrity as [[Shockofgod]] will be promoting the campaign "full throttle". :) [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbmAn3M8r0I] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:45, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
Although the Conservapedia evolution article is a thorn in the side of many internet atheists/evolutionists (as it cites evolutionists candidly admitting the many fatal and serious weaknesses of the evolutionary paradigm) and continues to be a well trafficked article at Conservapedia, Conservapedia is considering making some changes to the CP evolution article. Of course, evolutionism devotees and other cranks will play no part in the revisions. There is no pressing need to do this, however, given that the [[Question evolution! campaign]] will grind away at evolutionary nonsense with great alacrity as [[Shockofgod]] will be promoting the campaign "full throttle". :) [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbmAn3M8r0I] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:45, 9 August 2011 (EDT)