Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 184: Line 184:     
:::::::::: Right ... and no [[Nobel Prize]], despite being the finest American physicist of the 20th century.  Note also that it was his criticism of relativity in the mid-1970s -- after the awards you cite -- that caused him to be punished by the Nobel Prize committee.  No one in grad school or on university faculties dare criticize Relativity again, no matter what the data say.  No relativist will even criticize the policy of excluding anyone who criticizes the theory of relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:13, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::::: Right ... and no [[Nobel Prize]], despite being the finest American physicist of the 20th century.  Note also that it was his criticism of relativity in the mid-1970s -- after the awards you cite -- that caused him to be punished by the Nobel Prize committee.  No one in grad school or on university faculties dare criticize Relativity again, no matter what the data say.  No relativist will even criticize the policy of excluding anyone who criticizes the theory of relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:13, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::::::: I am sure the Nobel committee has its prejudices. Hoyle once wrote a letter to the London Times criticizing a Nobel physics prize. [http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/oct/03/fred-hoyle-nobel-prize/print] So maybe they did not like him for that. By the time they gave the big bang prize in 1978, Gamow and others were dead. I would have rather given the prize to the theorists, but those are the biases of the folks in Sweden. I am not sure it has anything to do with the acceptability of relativity. There is a lot of excellent theoretical work that never got a prize, such as the work of Poincare and Minkowski on relativity. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 22:56, 28 August 2011 (EDT)
    
== Standard kilogrammes? ==
 
== Standard kilogrammes? ==

Navigation menu