Changes

:::::::::::::I'm sure many liberals would disagree with me, that just makes me more assured in my position.  However I prayed for a moment and actually came up with a compromise that would work for both of us.  How about we have one article called [[American heroism]] and have two sections one called "Heroes" and one called "Heroines" it isn't how I would do it if I was in charge, but compromise is ok as long as it isn't your core principles. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 23:50, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

:::::::::::::I'm sure many liberals would disagree with me, that just makes me more assured in my position.  However I prayed for a moment and actually came up with a compromise that would work for both of us.  How about we have one article called [[American heroism]] and have two sections one called "Heroes" and one called "Heroines" it isn't how I would do it if I was in charge, but compromise is ok as long as it isn't your core principles. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 23:50, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

::::::::::::::Be careful with that word, Liberal, using it against people who disagree with you is a very quick way to ruin your standing. And sure, i'll go for that. I'm not a big conflict person :/--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:54, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

::::::::::::::Be careful with that word, Liberal, using it against people who disagree with you is a very quick way to ruin your standing. And sure, i'll go for that. I'm not a big conflict person :/--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 23:54, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

== American ==

== American ==