SkipCaptcha
708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 53:
Line 53: − [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 03:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)+ − + + + + + + + + + + + − + + +
Essay:Problems in Cosmology (view source)
Revision as of 21:37, August 31, 2011
, 21:37, August 31, 2011no edit summary
For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may repeat herself or himself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of 11 step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''surely'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe out of nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who believed in it too. Though he believed that the expansion would turn out to be decelerating according to his theory while it turned out to be apparent and looking like accelerating. That I managed to explain after splitting the illusion of acceleration to Taylor series and confirming the observations with accuracy to one standard deviation. So the expansion being an illusion got confirmed by all observations. Though still not accepted by scientific journals, so the astronomers are sent on a wild goose chase to find this "[[dark energy]]" somewhere in the universe.
For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may repeat herself or himself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of 11 step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''surely'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe out of nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who believed in it too. Though he believed that the expansion would turn out to be decelerating according to his theory while it turned out to be apparent and looking like accelerating. That I managed to explain after splitting the illusion of acceleration to Taylor series and confirming the observations with accuracy to one standard deviation. So the expansion being an illusion got confirmed by all observations. Though still not accepted by scientific journals, so the astronomers are sent on a wild goose chase to find this "[[dark energy]]" somewhere in the universe.
==Sociology==
[[category:Physics]]
All the sociological problems seem to be about money.
===Money makes the world go around===
One of such money hungry ptoject connected with Big Bang is desribed in ''"New Scientist"'', LATEST ARTICLES: Don't panic about the missing Higgs – for now. Under the title ''"The Large Hadron Collider"'' ''"New Scientist"'' writes:
:The LHC is the world's biggest ever physics experiment, and by studying conditions close to those just after the big bang, it could solve some of science's deepest mysteries
That's why the legend of big bang must go on. The naive "cranks" who think that one pencil, a few pads, and a waste basket is enough to do science as it used to be when Einstein applied for a job in Patent office, simply don't know what they are talking about. What powers they are against. And therefore what are their chances to stop spending billions of taxpayers money on feeding idiots who "work" on idiotic problems that don't even exist (like the Big Bang) since all are just the cargo cult science which might be obvious from the short Feynman rant against [[relativists]].
[[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:37, 31 August 2011 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category: Cosmology]]
[[Category:Cosmology]]
[[category:Astronomy]]
[[category:Physics]]