Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 35: Line 35:  
So the gravitation is slightly  different than what the contemporary cosmologists and astrophysicists, who belived them, thought.  
 
So the gravitation is slightly  different than what the contemporary cosmologists and astrophysicists, who belived them, thought.  
   −
==There is more to gravitation than that==
+
===There is more to gravitation than that===
    
Something that destroys the Big Bang is much stronger. It is that the most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion and reality is the flat spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.
 
Something that destroys the Big Bang is much stronger. It is that the most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion and reality is the flat spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu