Changes

===So how come then, the lack of expansion, is science?===

===So how come then, the lack of expansion, is science?===

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame. Science works only on faith that what one "knows" from other people is true. Then one has to evaluate the knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what one "knows" is true.  

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame. Science works only on faith that what one ''knows'' from other people is true. Then one has to evaluate the knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what one '''knows'' is true.  

And always there may come someone and ask: ''"How do you know it is true?"'' And then one has to tell the whole story of it starting with Adam and Eve (or just ''"ab ovo"'' if one prefers Latin).  

And always there may come someone and ask: ''"How do you know it is true?"'' And then one has to tell the whole story of it starting with Adam and Eve (or just ''"ab ovo"'' if one prefers Latin).  

In some cases the probability is so high that one assumes it as being a "sure thing". That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is still science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't know since some article that described this ''truth'' aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would now that the universe is not expanding since their high school years, and that there was no reason for the universe to expand except misinformed folks who belived in expansion for its illusion.

In some cases the probability is so high that one assumes it as being a ''sure thing''. That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is still science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't know since some article that described this ''truth'' aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would ''know'' that the universe is not expanding since their high school years, and that there was no reason for the universe to expand except misinformed folks who took the illusion of expansion for real expansion.

This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happen to know since I ''checked my data'' to a sufficient degree to tell what is not true. Science, not being able to present positive proof is quite able to reject what is not true. And so it is the main mode of its operation: rejecting what's false so what's left ''may be'' true. That's why what I know is [[science]] (since I know which part is false that can be proven with simple math. In which math is good: in rejecting ''false reasons'' for something being true.

This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happen to know since I ''checked my data'' to a sufficient degree to tell what is not true. [[Science]], not being able to present positive proof of its assurances is quite able to reject what is not true. And so it is the main mode of its operation: rejecting what's false so what's left is [[science]]. That's why what I know is [[science]] (since I know which part is false that can be proven with simple math. In which math is good: in rejecting ''false reasons'' for something being true.

I'm supported in my faith by Richard P. Feynman whose ''"Feynman lectures on physics"'' I read and believed. So I'm a kind of believer, at least in the existence of objective truth. That's why reading characterisation of [[relativists]] I have no reason not to believe Feynman.

I'm supported in my ''faith'' by Richard P. Feynman whose ''"Feynman lectures on physics"'' I read and believed. So I'm a kind of ''believer'', at least in the existence of ''objective truth''. That's why reading characterisation of [[relativists]] whom I know from various encounters I have no reason not to believe Feynman.

===So why the universe looks like expanding?===

===So why the universe looks like expanding?===