Changes

Astrophysicists never even calculated how much of ''[[intrinsic redshift]]'' there is in the universe before jumping to conclusion that the universe is expanding. Had they calculated, or asked somebody who knows high school calculus, they would have avoided the embarrassment<ref>I've seen an appeal of an astronomer to Carl Sagan to end this scandal with Big Bang since, as put by the author of the appeal, ''"it makes all astronomers look like idiots"'', but the lobby of [[relativists]] turned out to be stronger, or Carl Sagan didn't know that the Big Bang is a fake.</ref> and a lame hypothesis that the universe is expanding.

Astrophysicists never even calculated how much of ''[[intrinsic redshift]]'' there is in the universe before jumping to conclusion that the universe is expanding. Had they calculated, or asked somebody who knows high school calculus, they would have avoided the embarrassment<ref>I've seen an appeal of an astronomer to Carl Sagan to end this scandal with Big Bang since, as put by the author of the appeal, ''"it makes all astronomers look like idiots"'', but the lobby of [[relativists]] turned out to be stronger, or Carl Sagan didn't know that the Big Bang is a fake.</ref> and a lame hypothesis that the universe is expanding.

===There is more to gravitation than that===

===There is more to gravitation than refuting the Big Bang===

Something that refutes the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis is much stronger. Except explaining the gravitational force as seeking by the particles the most probable location in spacetime, pushing in the process on other particles with a force that is presently (in post Newtonian times) called ''gravitational force''

This more is that except explaining the gravitational force by seeking by the particles the most probable location in spacetime, location of lowest energy, pushing in the process on the other particles with a force that is presently called ''gravitational force''

:<math>F=-(d/dx)[E=mc^2(d\tau/dt)]</math>

:<math>F=-(d/dx)[E=mc^2(d\tau/dt)]</math>

where <math>x</math> is didplacement, <math>E</math> is energy of particle, <math>m</math> is mass of particle, <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>\tau</math> is proper time of particle, and <math>t</math>, is the time of observer. The most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion of universe and reality is the flat spacetime proposed in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.

where <math>x</math> is displacement, <math>E</math> is energy of particle, rest or total, <math>m</math> is mass of particle [[invariant mass|invariant]] or [[relativistic mass|"relativistic"]], as energy, depending on application, <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>\tau</math> is proper time of particle, and <math>t</math>, is the time of observer. The most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion of universe and reality is the flat spacetime proposed in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).  

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).  

According to exact calculations, that in this case the Newtonian calculations are (and not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917, its [[Hubble constant]]: assumed ratio of recession velocity of galaxies to their distance) in reality this ratio turns out to be  

According to exact calculations, that in this case the Newtonian calculations are (and not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917, its [[Hubble constant]], ratio of cosmological redshift to the distance from our Galaxy, in reality the Hubble constant turns out to be  

:<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>,  

:<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>,