Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 29: Line 29:  
Since the news, with the supporting calculations, have been rejected without peer reviews by scientific journals, they stayed unknown.   
 
Since the news, with the supporting calculations, have been rejected without peer reviews by scientific journals, they stayed unknown.   
   −
Astrophysicists never even calculated how much of ''[[intrinsic redshift]]'' there is in the universe before jumping to conclusion that the universe is expanding. Had they calculated, or asked somebody who knows high school calculus, they would have avoided the embarrassment<ref>I've seen an appeal of an astronomer to Carl Sagan to end this scandal with Big Bang since, as put by the author of the appeal, ''"it makes all astronomers look like idiots"'', but the lobby of [[relativists]] turned out to be stronger, or Carl Sagan didn't know that the Big Bang is a fake.</ref> and a hypothesis that the universe is expanding.
+
Astrophysicists never even calculated how much of ''[[intrinsic redshift]]'' there is in the universe before jumping to conclusion that the universe is expanding. Had they calculated, or asked somebody who knows high school calculus, they would have avoided the embarrassment<ref>I've seen an appeal of an astronomer to Carl Sagan to end this scandal with Big Bang since, as put by the author of the appeal, ''"it makes all astronomers look like idiots"'', but the lobby of [[relativists]] turned out to be stronger, and Carl Sagan didn't know that the Big Bang is a fake.</ref> and a hypothesis that the universe is expanding.
    
===There is more to gravitation than refuting the Big Bang===
 
===There is more to gravitation than refuting the Big Bang===
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu