Changes

where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].

where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]].

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space? Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake refuted by the lack of expansion of universe?<ref>And we remember that science works only through rejection of false claimes. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be such despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proved that math is not science, and only physics is, which we knew anyway.</ref>

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space? Isn't it something to wonder about? Not to mention the simple calculation of observed cosmological redshift and its acceleration. Isn't it a proof telling that the Big Bang is a fake refuted by the lack of expansion of universe?<ref>And we remember that science works only through rejection of false claimes. Didn't Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler the authors of 1973 ''"Gravitation"'', that started the [[Big Bang]] craze, turned out to be cranks despite their mathematical sophistication? Which only proves that math is not science, and only physics is, which we knew anyway.</ref>

===And what happened to gravitational energy?===

===And what happened to gravitational energy?===