SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 575:
Line 575: + + + +
Talk:Biblical scientific foreknowledge (view source)
Revision as of 03:23, September 4, 2011
, 03:23, September 4, 2011→Section on bloodletting: new section
:The [[Bible]] is providing valuable scientific data here. Sometimes a [[Nobel Prize]] is given based on the observation of data, even though the data are not yet well understood by the recipients of the Prize. If observing data can be enough for a Nobel Prize, then why can't it be enough for the Bible?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:23, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
:The [[Bible]] is providing valuable scientific data here. Sometimes a [[Nobel Prize]] is given based on the observation of data, even though the data are not yet well understood by the recipients of the Prize. If observing data can be enough for a Nobel Prize, then why can't it be enough for the Bible?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:23, 3 September 2011 (EDT)
== Section on bloodletting ==
I removed the section on bloodletting as it doesn't demonstrate foreknowledge. ASchlaffly reverted it, so it appears that a discussion may be useful. Pontius Pilate notes that Jesus died more quickly than people usually did from crucifixion, however he offers no explanation of why it happened, nor even if it was caused by anything they did. In order to be foreknowledge, Pontius Pilate would have to have said "when you remove blood from someone, they die quicker." He didn't, all he said was that Jesus died more quickly than most people. It takes more than saying something happened, and science not working out why for a long time, in order to show foreknowledge. Because it doesn't demonstrate, the section on bloodletting should be removed. - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 23:23, 3 September 2011 (EDT)