Changes

===How come the lack of expansion is science?===

===How come the lack of expansion is science?===

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame as it happened with the Big Bang hypothesis. Science works only on faith that what one ''knows'' from other people is true. Then one has to evaluate the knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what one '''knows'' is true.  

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame as it happened with the Big Bang hypothesis. Science works only on faith that what one ''"knows"'' from other people is true. Then one has to evaluate the knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what one ''"knows"'' is true.  

Always there may come someone and ask: ''"How do you know it is true?"'' And then one has to tell the whole story starting with Adam and Eve (or just ''"ab ovo"'').  

Always there may come someone and ask: ''"How do you know it is true?"'' And then one has to tell the whole story starting with Adam and Eve (or just ''"ab ovo"''). And one who asked decides: is it convincing or not.

In some cases the probability is so high that one assumes it as being a ''sure thing''. That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is still science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't know since some article that described this ''truth'' aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would ''know'' that the universe is not expanding since their high school years, and that there was no reason for the universe to expand except misinformed folks who took the illusion of expansion for the real expansion.

In some cases the probability is so high that one assumes it as being a ''sure thing''. That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't know since some article that described this ''truth'' aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would ''know'' that the universe is not expanding since their high school years, and that there was no reason for the universe to expand except misinformed folks who took the illusion of expansion for the real expansion.

This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happen to know since I ''checked my data'' to a sufficient degree to tell what is not true. [[Science]], not being able to present positive proof of its assurances is quite able to reject what is not true. It is the main mode of its operation: rejecting what's false so what's left is [[science]]. That's why what I know is [[science]].

This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happen to know since I ''checked my data'' to a sufficient degree to tell what is not true. [[Science]], not being able to present positive proof of its assurances is quite able to reject what is not true. It is the main mode of its operation: rejecting what's false so what's left is [[science]]. That's why what I know is [[science]].