Changes

that was differentiated in the section above to produce "gravitational force".

that was differentiated in the section above to produce "gravitational force".

What?!!! Said every physicists I told this story during the 15 minute breaks in their lectures while I was studying astronomy (except two professors who considered it interesting beyond their area of expertise though, them being perticle physicists). The opponents said: ''"if it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school"''<ref>So why don't you teach it in high schools? I say. Explanation in part 3, titled '''sociology'''.</ref>.  

What?!!! Said every physicists I told this story during the 15 minute breaks in their lectures while I was studying astronomy (except two professors who considered it interesting though, beyond their area of expertise, them being perticle physicists). The opponents said: ''"if it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school"''<ref>So why don't you teach it in high schools? I say. Explanation in part 3, titled '''sociology'''.</ref>.  

I am a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despite I discovered those things already in 1985 they were not published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but suppressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student any more just a unofficial PhD student writing thesis on GTR, and so my paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif shouldn't be linked to from their server making them suspected of supporting my PhD thesis. So when the university banned my one page paper ''"[[Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]"'' I typed it in into conservapedia as an essay<ref>[[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]</ref>, and let's see how long it survives here.  

I am a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despite I discovered those things already in 1985 they were never published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but suppressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student any more just a unofficial PhD student writing thesis on GTR, and so my paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif shouldn't be linked to from their server making them suspected of supporting my PhD thesis. So when the university banned my one page paper ''"[[Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]"'' I typed it in into conservapedia as an essay<ref>[[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]</ref>, and let's see how long it survives here.  

Let's hope that CP readers don't consider anybody who don't share their prejudice about the Big Bang hypothesis, apparently the main cosmological theory of our times, not so seriously as RW readers did. They made it clear that a crackpot like me should find himself a different wiki for debunking the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis, apparently supported even by [[Richard Dawkins]]. Too bad that not by the elementary physics.  

Let's hope that CP readers don't consider anybody who don't share their prejudice about the Big Bang hypothesis, apparently the main cosmological theory of our times, not so seriously as RW readers did. They made it clear that a crackpot like me should find himself a different wiki for debunking the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis, apparently supported even by [[Richard Dawkins]]. Too bad that not by the elementary physics.