44
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 55:
Line 55: + + + +
Debate:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability? (view source)
Revision as of 09:20, April 7, 2007
, 09:20, April 7, 2007→No. Not always:
== No. Not always: ==
== No. Not always: ==
No. Wikipedia is edited by people from all around the world (even the English language version), so obviously the average point of view expressed on Wikipedia is not going to be the same as the average point of view in the US. And it's especially not going to be the same as the average point of view expressed by American conservatives (who don't represent all Americans). And it's especially especially not going to be the same as the average point of view expressed by American-Christian-biblical-literalist-creationist-pro-war-anti-free-trade conservatives (who don't represent all American conservatives). Is representing the whole world somehow evidence of bias???
And what nuthead got the idea to call this thing "conservapedia" anyway, when it clearly does not represent conservatives as a whole??? --[[User:Madonna|Madonna]] 05:20, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Simply because they are liberally biased does not always effect their reliability.
Simply because they are liberally biased does not always effect their reliability.