Changes

In removing the "Biblical Proof" section (which I'm not reinstating because I don't really understand what it was getting at), he said, "''the bible doesn't give proof. the point of religion is tthat it is faith-based, and cannot be proven. That's why not everyone is a Christian. See Douglas Adams's Hitchhiker's Guide for the reasons)''".  When oh when are bibliosceptics going to stop telling Christians what the basis of their beliefs are?  "Faith", in the Bible, is ''not'' something without evidence.  It is ''trust, based on evidence''.  Sure, there may not be scientific/mathematical/etc. "proof", but neither is it evidence-free.  And citing a work of fiction in support...???  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

In removing the "Biblical Proof" section (which I'm not reinstating because I don't really understand what it was getting at), he said, "''the bible doesn't give proof. the point of religion is tthat it is faith-based, and cannot be proven. That's why not everyone is a Christian. See Douglas Adams's Hitchhiker's Guide for the reasons)''".  When oh when are bibliosceptics going to stop telling Christians what the basis of their beliefs are?  "Faith", in the Bible, is ''not'' something without evidence.  It is ''trust, based on evidence''.  Sure, there may not be scientific/mathematical/etc. "proof", but neither is it evidence-free.  And citing a work of fiction in support...???  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 4 April 2007 (EDT)