SkipCaptcha
1,125
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 80:
Line 80: +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 02:29, September 9, 2011
, 02:29, September 9, 2011→Something is Fishy
:::Have you ever noticed that liberals use the word "seem" a lot when they do not have a strong case? :) I really do not see a strong case being made. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:20, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Have you ever noticed that liberals use the word "seem" a lot when they do not have a strong case? :) I really do not see a strong case being made. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:20, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Actually I agree with FRodgers here. While there is much to say against evolution, the Question Evolution! campaign just ask some unrelated questions. For example: Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution?It is not because a theory is useless that it is false. In fact, there are not much scientific breakthroughs due to creation neither.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:25, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Actually I agree with FRodgers here. While there is much to say against evolution, the Question Evolution! campaign just ask some unrelated questions. For example: Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution?It is not because a theory is useless that it is false. In fact, there are not much scientific breakthroughs due to creation neither.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:25, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::i can't think of any evolutionary scientific breakthroughs either. But neither can I think of any creation ones - does anyone know of any? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 22:29, 8 September 2011 (EDT)