nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 170:
Line 170: + Line 184:
Line 185: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 13:33, April 7, 2007
, 13:33, April 7, 2007→What's this article trying to achieve?: Getting technical...
::::Jesus was the Creator, so he would know, and He endorsed what Genesis said. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:58, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Jesus was the Creator, so he would know, and He endorsed what Genesis said. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:58, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::Well, technically, the only thing we know is that second-hand accounts claimed that Jesus endorsed what Genesis said. We ain't got nothin' from Jesus himself. Jesus didn't write anything. --[[User:ReaganLives|ReaganLives]] 08:46, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::Well, technically, the only thing we know is that second-hand accounts claimed that Jesus endorsed what Genesis said. We ain't got nothin' from Jesus himself. Jesus didn't write anything. --[[User:ReaganLives|ReaganLives]] 08:46, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::If you want to get technical about it, the ultimate author of the Bible was God, Jesus is God, ergo Jesus is the author of the Bible, so we do have it from Jesus Himself. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:33, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:Or so it's reported in the Gospels.
:Or so it's reported in the Gospels.
:::Vero, Petre. Interesting that Philip states religious dogma as fact. Note, Philip, that I did not use the theological title "Christ" (i.e., Jesus as God), but rather used his human name, thus referring to Jesus as a man. Thus, having clarified my question, I shall ask again: how would you (or anyone else for that matter) know what Jesus "knew". [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 08:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Vero, Petre. Interesting that Philip states religious dogma as fact. Note, Philip, that I did not use the theological title "Christ" (i.e., Jesus as God), but rather used his human name, thus referring to Jesus as a man. Thus, having clarified my question, I shall ask again: how would you (or anyone else for that matter) know what Jesus "knew". [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 08:10, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: I was stating it in a matter-of-fact way because I was answering the question of how Jesus would know. That's how He would know, and in that context it was proper to put it in that way.
:::: I fail to grasp the distinction that you are making between Jesus as God and Jesus as man, therefore my answer stands. Are you suggesting that the man Jesus was totally oblivious to what He had done as God?
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:33, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
== Protected debate page? ==
== Protected debate page? ==