Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 248: Line 248:  
Therefore the EGR explains most of numerical results that the [[Big Bang]] cosmology is unable to explain.
 
Therefore the EGR explains most of numerical results that the [[Big Bang]] cosmology is unable to explain.
   −
===Critique of the Big Bang hypothesis===
+
===Critique of the Big Bang hypothesis (BBH)===
   −
Einsteinian gravitation allows neither "attractive" nor "repulsive" gravitational forced and so it does not allow any "[[dark energy]]" with which the Big Bang aficionados try to patch their failed model of universe in which the need for "[[dark energy]]" is by no means the only flaw.
+
First of all there is no expansion of universe as it was proven by application of high school calculus to simple task of predicting the amount of intrinsic redshift BBH. Lack of expansion disqualifies the BBH.  
−
 
  −
Gravitational forces forces are inertial only. Also there is no ''potential gravitational energy'' beyond energy contained in the mass <math>m</math> of any particle, which is now a counterpart of the old Newtonian ''potential energy'' as there is no other ''potential energy'' in the universe. Especially no negative energy exploding in the Big Bang event, at the beginning of the universe, since Einstein's universe being eternal doesn't have any beginning.
      
==Strange history of Einsteinian gravitation==
 
==Strange history of Einsteinian gravitation==
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu