Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 82: Line 82:  
To keep Einstein's field equation of this stationary model stable, and not knowing yet about the ''"[[Hubble time dilation]]"'', discovered by Edwin Hubble over a decade later, and suggesting to some cosmologists that the universe might be expanding, Einstein added his ''"cosmological constant"'' to his field equation that stopped the alleged expansion of his model universe. Later he called this cosmological constant ''"the biggest blunder of his life"''.  
 
To keep Einstein's field equation of this stationary model stable, and not knowing yet about the ''"[[Hubble time dilation]]"'', discovered by Edwin Hubble over a decade later, and suggesting to some cosmologists that the universe might be expanding, Einstein added his ''"cosmological constant"'' to his field equation that stopped the alleged expansion of his model universe. Later he called this cosmological constant ''"the biggest blunder of his life"''.  
   −
In 1985 the ''"cosmological constant"'' turned out to be unnecessary since it turned out that the Hubble redshift might be not caused by expansion of the universe but by the time runing slower at the deep space galaxies in curved space, which according to ''Einsteinian gravitation'' (see below) simulates accelerating expansion of space with <math>dH(t)/dt=-H_o^2/2</math> as observed in 1998 by the Supernova Cosmology Project team of astronomers and therefore predicted by ''Einsteinian gravitation'' over 80 years earlier.
+
In 1985 the ''"cosmological constant"'' turned out to be unnecessary since it turned out that the Hubble redshift might be not caused by expansion of the universe but by the time runing slower at the deep space galaxies in curved space, which according to ''Einsteinian gravitation'' (see below) simulates accelerating expansion of space with
 +
 
 +
:<math>dH(t)/dt=-H_o^2/2</math>  
 +
 
 +
as observed in 1998 by the Supernova Cosmology Project team of astronomers and therefore predicted by ''Einsteinian gravitation'' over 80 years earlier.
    
The agreement of value of alleged acceleration of space with the results of observations of Supernova Cosmology Project within one standard deviation suggest that the expansion of universe is an illusion but the news has been never published yet and is not likely to be published soon (except in conservapedia).  
 
The agreement of value of alleged acceleration of space with the results of observations of Supernova Cosmology Project within one standard deviation suggest that the expansion of universe is an illusion but the news has been never published yet and is not likely to be published soon (except in conservapedia).  
SkipCaptcha
708

edits

Navigation menu