SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: +
Talk:Atheism and morality (view source)
Revision as of 13:41, September 13, 2011
, 13:41, September 13, 2011→Rename to Atheism and immorality
:I agree. Regardless of whether people agree or disagree with the article, surely there should be a consensus that the title should be accurate. It's almost as silly of a title as the 'Counterexamples to the Bible' the first sentence of which is "There are no Counterexamples to the Bible". - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 21:24, 12 September 2011 (EDT)
:I agree. Regardless of whether people agree or disagree with the article, surely there should be a consensus that the title should be accurate. It's almost as silly of a title as the 'Counterexamples to the Bible' the first sentence of which is "There are no Counterexamples to the Bible". - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 21:24, 12 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Atheism and morality is a good title. Morality measures atheism and atheism doesn't measure up. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:58, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Atheism and morality is a good title. Morality measures atheism and atheism doesn't measure up. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:58, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
::::I don't see how the second sentence supports your point of view. The title is misleading, as the article is about the opposite of what the title says, and I think this requires a decent justification. - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 09:41, 13 September 2011 (EDT)