| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the [[scientific method]], as well as to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research. | | Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on the [[scientific method]], as well as to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research. |
| | | | |
| − | Science is based on the ontological position of [[Empiricism]], which states that knowledge must be based upon observable phenomena that are both testable (their validity can be falsified) and repeatable (another researcher, working under the same conditions, can produce a similar result). | + | Science is based on the ontological position of [[Empiricism]], which states that knowledge must be based upon observable phenomena that are both testable (their validity can be falsified) and repeatable (another researcher, working under the same conditions, can produce a similar result). The [[principle of induction]] is used to predict future results derived from a [[hypothesis]] based on previous results. |
| | | | |
| | Science is not to be confused with [[Materialism]], the view that the material realm is all that exists. As a rule, science does not discount the existence of non-observable phenomena, however since theories concerned with such matters are not falsifiable{{fact-scientific}} they are not amenable to empirical investigation, and are therefore not topics that science addresses. | | Science is not to be confused with [[Materialism]], the view that the material realm is all that exists. As a rule, science does not discount the existence of non-observable phenomena, however since theories concerned with such matters are not falsifiable{{fact-scientific}} they are not amenable to empirical investigation, and are therefore not topics that science addresses. |
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | | | |
| | The essential elements of a scientific method are iterations, recursions, interleavings, and orderings of the following: | | The essential elements of a scientific method are iterations, recursions, interleavings, and orderings of the following: |
| − | -Characterizations (Quantifications, observations, and measurements)
| + | |
| − | -Hypotheses (theoretical, hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements)
| + | '''Characterizations''' (Quantifications, observations, and measurements) |
| − | -Predictions (reasoning including logical deduction from hypothesis and theory)
| + | |
| − | -Experiments (tests of all of the above)
| + | '''Hypotheses''' (theoretical, hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements) |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Predictions''' (reasoning including logical deduction from hypothesis and theory) |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Experiments''' (tests of all of the above) |
| | | | |
| | Most scientific discoveries appear to be in conflict with a [[literal]] interpretation of many [[holy books]], including the [[Bible]]. However, science and empiricism make no claims about the nature of any potential [[supernatural]], [[immaterial]] realm, as these are impossible to assess empirically. Many scientists use philosophical tools such as [[Occam's razor]] and point to phenomena such as [[The God of the Gaps]] to argue for an implicit rejection of untestable hypotheses. | | Most scientific discoveries appear to be in conflict with a [[literal]] interpretation of many [[holy books]], including the [[Bible]]. However, science and empiricism make no claims about the nature of any potential [[supernatural]], [[immaterial]] realm, as these are impossible to assess empirically. Many scientists use philosophical tools such as [[Occam's razor]] and point to phenomena such as [[The God of the Gaps]] to argue for an implicit rejection of untestable hypotheses. |
| | | | |
| | ==Kansas controversy== | | ==Kansas controversy== |
| | + | |
| | The definition of science caused a heated controversy in Kansas that drew nationwide attention. <ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/15/science/sciencespecial2/15evol.html?ex=1289710800&en=8222cfc9c70fd951&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss</ref> Here are the definitions that were at issue for use by the state schools. | | The definition of science caused a heated controversy in Kansas that drew nationwide attention. <ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/15/science/sciencespecial2/15evol.html?ex=1289710800&en=8222cfc9c70fd951&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss</ref> Here are the definitions that were at issue for use by the state schools. |
| | | | |