Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − ▄▄█▀▀ █▬█ █ ▀█▀+ + + + +
ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish (view source)
Revision as of 15:51, September 13, 2011
, 15:51, September 13, 2011Reverted edits by Shjt (talk) to last revision by TheGuy
In '''''ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish''''', 490 U.S. 605 (1989), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] restated the [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in the lower federal courts of a decision reached by the highest state court, because such authority is vested solely in the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. See:
*''District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman'', 460 U.S. 462 (1983)
*''Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers'', 398 U.S. 281, 296 (1970)
*''Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.'', 263 U.S. 413, 415-416 (1923)
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]