Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
476 bytes added ,  23:51, September 13, 2011
Line 126: Line 126:     
I just corrected "scientific" the word used in description of the Big Bang to the proper in this case term "pseudo scientific". See also my [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] where I explain why the Big Bang is a pseudo scientific hypothesis (between other things it assumes "curved" spacetime for which there is no evidence and a lot of to contrary) and how Einsteinian gravitation works. The essay is still not finished and so I invite anybody to expres their opinion on the talk page of the essay. Thanks. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:35, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
I just corrected "scientific" the word used in description of the Big Bang to the proper in this case term "pseudo scientific". See also my [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] where I explain why the Big Bang is a pseudo scientific hypothesis (between other things it assumes "curved" spacetime for which there is no evidence and a lot of to contrary) and how Einsteinian gravitation works. The essay is still not finished and so I invite anybody to expres their opinion on the talk page of the essay. Thanks. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 17:35, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== "even though the theory is based on little more than guesswork, speculation, and dubious assumptions." ==
 +
 +
I must agree with the removal of the above sentence. The big bang theory is based on the observations of red shifts, background radiation and other observational and physical properties of the universe. However, it is the assumptions the Big Bang theorists draw from this that are the debatable part. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:51, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
1,125

edits

Navigation menu