SkipCaptcha
708
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 129:
Line 129: − +
Talk:Big Bang theory (view source)
Revision as of 21:51, September 14, 2011
, 21:51, September 14, 2011→Correcting "scientific": typo
:I have already expressed my opinion on the talk page of that essay: you're a crackpot. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 20:02, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
:I have already expressed my opinion on the talk page of that essay: you're a crackpot. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 20:02, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
::Sam, the fact that I'm a crackpot has certain influence on my credibility (which I never clamed being high, while I'm only a sculptor, with only one year training in general realativity, and the rest of my formal education being in electrical engineeiring) but it surely has no influence on the truth of Big Bang hypothesis (BBH).
::Sam, the fact that I'm a crackpot has certain influence on my credibility (which I never claimed being high, while I'm only a sculptor, with only one year training in general realativity, and the rest of my formal education being in electrical engineeiring) but it surely has no influence on the truth of Big Bang hypothesis (BBH).
::The biggest flaw of BBH is an assumption that the universe is expanding while it is not.
::The biggest flaw of BBH is an assumption that the universe is expanding while it is not.