Changes

First of all there is no expansion of universe as it was proven by application of high school calculus to simple task of predicting the amount of [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe in BBH. Lack of expansion disqualifies the BBH.

First of all there is no expansion of universe as it was proven by application of high school calculus to simple task of predicting the amount of [[intrinsic redshift]] in the universe in BBH. Lack of expansion disqualifies the BBH.

Since humans are not easily convinced by one proof of invalidity of sertain assumption and easier by multiple proofs, there are more flaws of BBH:

Since humans are not easily convinced by one proof of invalidity of certain assumption and easier by multiple proofs, there are more flaws of BBH:

* curvature of spacetime of the universe, allegedly causing gravitation, while gravitation is most likely caused by 10 curvatures of spacetime, together forming a flat spacetime, while "curved spacetime" would produce disappearing of physical objects not observed in nature,

* curvature of spacetime of the universe, allegedly causing gravitation, while gravitation is most likely caused by 10 curvatures of spacetime, together forming a flat spacetime, while "curved spacetime" would produce disappearing of physical objects not observed in nature,

* symmetric matric of spacetime, allegedly causing a need for assuming that spacetime is "expanding" while Einstein specifically presented the demand that metric tensor '''''must be non symmetric'''''<ref>

* symmetric matric of spacetime, allegedly causing a need for assuming that spacetime is "expanding" while Einstein specifically presented the demand that metric tensor '''''must be non symmetric'''''<ref>