Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 158:
Line 158: + + + +
Talk:Big Bang theory (view source)
Revision as of 19:32, September 15, 2011
, 19:32, September 15, 2011Do we need to be consistent?
:::Additional note, Sam, what good it would do if we believed in things that are not true? As pseudo scientific theories usually are. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 14:29, 15 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Additional note, Sam, what good it would do if we believed in things that are not true? As pseudo scientific theories usually are. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 14:29, 15 September 2011 (EDT)
::::It's interesting to our readers that the founders of the [[scientific method]] were religious. We always want to know more about people who have influenced currents of modern thought.
::::When someone proposes "[[intelligent design]]", do we respond to the challenge of the idea purely on its merits, or do we consider the motives of its proponents? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:32, 15 September 2011 (EDT)
== Hmm ==
== Hmm ==